We get asked this question often now, and the short answer is usually ‘yes’. The longer answer is more complex though, so for those with a little more patience here is the longer answer.
The phrase ‘risk asessment’ is actually quite broad and vague, our pack covers three areas and each area is very different. So, to try and answer the question a little better, we really need three questions:
Q1 Do I need a licensing risk asessment?
Whilst there is no current legislation to compel you to carry out a licensing risk asessment that does not mean that you don’t need one. It can be included as a condition on your premises licence, in which case the answer is ‘very yes, you do need one’, but often times it is something that your local licensing officers will expect to see as evidence that you are complying with the four licensing objectives.
If they come calling and ask for staff training records or a look at your drugs prevention strategy and you can’t provide them then it’s likely that you will be seeing more of them.
Licensing risk asessments are, in the main, not compulsory. But when you are in court looking at a £5000 fine for a failed test purchase or you are handed your closure notice you may reflect that licensing compliance is something worth taking seriously.
Q2 Do I need a fire risk assessment?
Almost certainly yes. Do you run a pub, a hotel, a cafe? Then yes, you must have a fire risk asessment.
The relevant legislation can be found Here and what it boils down to from our perspective is that any place of business must carry out a fire risk asessment. Of course, once you have identified the risks, you must act upon the findings.
The responsibility for fire risk is not always as cut and dried as you would think. Consider this extract:
The person who has control of the premises ( as occupier or otherwise ) in connection with the carrying on by him of a trade, buisiness or other undertaking ( for profit or not )…..
Clearly, this pulls managers into the frame as well. If you are running a business on behalf of someone else then the burden of ‘responsible person’ may well fall onto you.
The fire regulations are there to keep people safe. Complying to them is not optional and should not be viewed as optional. If you are responsible for business premises then you should carry out a fire risk assessment and act on the findings. Help is available and there is not always a cost involved, it is a responsibility though and you should take it seriously.
Q3 Do I need a health and safety risk asessment?
If you employ five or more people yes. You must carry out a risk asessment and record the findings.
If you employ fewer than five people a risk asessment still makes sense. Risk asessment is not that dificcult or expensive, and if the worst happens and you find yourself in court then a risk asessment can be the cornerstone of a ‘due dilligence’ defence.
Conclusion
Licensing compliance, health and safety compliance and fire safety are too often left to somebody else. Every now and again though, they are brought into sharp focus by an incident that leaves us all thinking ‘glad that wasn’t me’
When I am training in compliance I meet a surprising amount of resistance to the whole concept. People need to realise that if they are the responsible person and they find themselves stood in a charred building discussing events with a fire officer they will be asked for their risk asessment. If they can’t produce one they are in big trouble, and if it happens that there are body bags being hauled out of the building then the trouble will be bigger than any of us want to see.
There are plenty of resources and help available. We are big fans of the HSE website for health and safety advice and we have found that local EHO officers actually do want to help, as do the police and the fire service. If they see you trying they will help.
) our Stock Auditor software is ready for release.
Big Bucks For Blackpool
August 5th, 2008Travelodge has gotten excited this week at the government’s announcement that it is to spend £10 million of our money to re-generate three venerable old seaside towns; Blacpool, Dover and Torbay.
They don’t make it clear how this money will be split up, or even if it’s a typo because £3.3m won’t go very far in Blackpool or anywhere else, but I do think throwing £10m at three dilapidated old resorts is pretty much feeding strawberries to donkeys.
I live on the coast near Blackpool, and have seen first hand the decline in the town over the last couple of decades or so. To be fair, Blackpool is very good at what it does. What it does is play to a fairly straightforward audience of weekend pissheads and the ‘grey’ pound, markets that are wearisome and, erm, naturally declining respectively.
I do see some parrallels between tired English resorts and the licensed trade in that they both have an element of managed decline. I’m not a fan of local politicians, who is?, but the decision makers in Blackpool have been pretty creative over the years. It’s gone from being a solid, classic, family resort to the squalid shit-tip that we see buried in under a blizzard of blood and vomit every weekend these days without succumbing to the near total social and economic collapse that has hamstrung places like Morecambe.
Similarly, once thriving pubs seem to get passed through several smaller companies who manage them to a smaller and smaller profit but it keeps them alive for a while until they get boarded up and then pulled down or converted into carpet shops. There are some mercurial talents operating in this sector and I admire them.
We are good at managing decline in this country, from Empires to Pubs, and I do believe that it will be a feature of our lives for the foreseeable future.
Posted in General, News & Comment | No Comments »